Tuesday, December 22, 2009

THE FOOLISH OLD MAN WHO REMOVED THE MOUNTAINS



June 11, 1945
[This was Comrade Mao Tse-tung's concluding speech at the Seventh National Congress of the Communist Party of China.]



We have had a very successful congress. We have done three things. First, we have decided on the line of our Party, which is boldly to mobilize the masses and expand the people's forces so that, under the leadership of our Party, they will defeat the Japanese aggressors, liberate the whole people and build a new-democratic China. Second, we have adapted the new Party Constitution. Third, we have elected the leading body of the Party--the Central Committee. Henceforth our task is to lead the whole membership in carrying out the Party line. Ours has been a congress of victory, a congress of unity. The delegates have made excellent comments on the three reports. Many comrades have undertaken self-criticism; with unity as the objective unity has been achieved through self-criticism. This congress is a model of unity, of self-criticism and of inner-Party democracy.
When the congress closes, many comrades will be leaving for their posts and the various war fronts. Comrades, wherever you go, you should propagate the line of the congress and, through the members of the Party, explain it to the broad masses.
Our aim in propagating the line of the congress is to build up the confidence of the whole Party and the entire people in the certain triumph of the revolution. We must first raise the political consciousness of the vanguard so that, resolute and unafraid of sacrifice, they will surmount every difficulty to win victory. But this is not enough; we must also arouse the political consciousness of the entire people so that they may willingly and gladly fight together with us for victory. We should fire the whole people with the conviction that China belongs not to the reactionaries but to the Chinese people. There is an ancient Chinese fable called "The Foolish Old Man Who Removed the Mountains". It tells of an old man who lived in northern China long, long ago and was known as the Foolish Old Man of North Mountain. His house faced south and beyond his doorway stood the two great peaks, Taihang and Wangwu, obstructing the way. He called his sons, and hoe in hand they began to dig up these mountains with great determination. Another graybeard, known as the Wise Old Man, saw them and said derisively, "How silly of you to do this! It is quite impossible for you few to dig up those two huge mountains." The Foolish Old Man replied, "When I die, my sons will carry on; when they die, there will be my grandsons, and then their sons and grandsons, and so on to infinity. High as they are, the mountains cannot grow any higher and with every bit we dig, they will be that much lower. Why can't we clear them away?" Having refuted the Wise Old Man's wrong view, he went on digging every day, unshaken in his conviction. God was moved by this, and he sent down two angels, who carried the mountains away on their backs. Today, two big mountains lie like a dead weight on the Chinese people. One is imperialism, the other is feudalism. The Chinese Communist Party has long made up its mind to dig them up. We must persevere and work unceasingly, and we, too, will touch God's heart. Our God is none other than the masses of the Chinese people. If they stand up and dig together with us, why can't these two mountains be cleared away?
Yesterday, in a talk with two Americans who were leaving for the United States, I said that the U.S. government was trying to undermine us and this would not be permitted. We oppose the U.S. government's policy of supporting Chiang Kai-shek against the Communists. But we must draw a distinction, firstly, between the people of the United States and their government and, secondly, within the U.S. government between the policy-makers and their subordinates. I said to these two Americans, "Tell the policy-makers in your government that we forbid you Americans to enter the Liberated Areas because your policy is to support Chiang Kai-shek against the Communists, and we have to be on our guard. You can come to the Liberated Areas if your purpose is to fight Japan, but there must first be an agreement. We will not permit you to nose around everywhere. Since Patrick J. Hurley [1] has publicly declared against co-operation with the Chinese Communist Party, why do you still want to come and prowl around in our Liberated Areas?"
The U.S. government's policy of supporting Chiang Kai-shek against the Communists shows the brazenness of the U.S. reactionaries. But all the scheming of the reactionaries, whether Chinese or foreign, to prevent the Chinese people from achieving victory is doomed to failure. The democratic forces are the main current in the world today, while reaction is only a counter-current. The reactionary countercurrent is trying to swamp the main current of national independence and people's democracy, but it can never become the main current. Today, there are still three major contradictions in the old world, as Stalin pointed out long ago: first, the contradiction between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie in the imperialist countries; second, the contradiction between the various imperialist powers, and third, the contradiction between the colonial and semi-colonial countries and the imperialist metropolitan countries. [2] Not only do these three contradictions continue to exist but they are becoming more acute and widespread. Because of their existence and growth, the time will come when the reactionary anti-Soviet, anti-Communist and anti-democratic counter-current still in existence today will be swept away.
At this moment two congresses are being held in China, the Sixth National Congress of the Kuomintang and the Seventh National Congress of the Communist Party. They have completely different aims: the aim of one is to liquidate the Communist Party and all the other democratic forces in China and thus to plunge China into darkness; the aim of the other is to overthrow Japanese imperialism and its lackeys, the Chinese feudal forces, and build a new-democratic China and thus to lead China to light. Those two lines are in conflict with each other. We firmly believe that, led by the Chinese Communist Party and guided by the line of its Seventh Congress, the Chinese people will achieve complete victory, while the Kuomintang's counter-revolutionary line will inevitably fail.
NOTES
l. Patrick J. Hurley, a reactionary Republican Party politician, was appointed U.S. ambassador to China towards the end of 1944. In November 1945 he was forced to resign because his support for Chiang Kai-shek's anti-Communist policy roused the firm opposition of the Chinese people. Harley's open declaration against cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party was made on April 2, 1945 at a U.S. State Department press conference in Washington. For details, see "The Hurley-Chiang Duet Is a Flop", pp. 281-84 of this volume.
2. See J. V. Stalin, "The Foundations of Leninism", Works, Eng. ed., FLPH, Moscow, 1953, Vol. VI, pp. 74-82.



Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Condemn killing of Jharkhand Party President, Dhanapati Murmu

COMMUIST PARTY OF NDIA (MARXIST-LENINIST)
PROVISIONAL CENTRAL COMMITTEE
PHONE: 033-23543805, 2484218, 9332372220


PRESS RELEASE

Sri Dhanapati Murmu, the President of Jharkhand Party (Aditya Group) was killed on 29 November 2009 at Ramgarh (near Lalgarh) by the Maoists. Nearly a month ago, Panchanan Tudu, the President of Jharkhand Janamukti Morcha had been killed by them. More than a dozen members of various Jharkhandi parties have been killed over the last one year. The CPI(ML) condemns all these killings.

These parties have always been demanding autonomy to Paschimanchal, the introduction of Santhali and other tribal languages in primary schools and the right of forest-dwellers on forest-produce. When the CPI(M) tried to impose its one-party rule, these parties have been opposing it. At the time of Singur, Nandigram and Lalgarh movements these parties were actively supporting these movements. These parties are not in power either at center or any state.

Now the Maoists are trying to liquidate these parties from Jangalmahal simply because they would not allow the existence of any other political party in the area. By these actions the Maoists are disrupting the basic unity of the people and harming the Lalgarh movement. Moreover, the terrorist state is getting legitimacy in its attack on the mass movements.

The CPI(ML) calls upon all political parties and mass organizations in Paschimanchal to join a dialogue so that people’s power based on electable and revocable representatives may be formed and a united movement for self-rule may be waged against the state.

The CPI(ML) calls upon all democratic forces and individuals in the country to exert their influence to bring all forces to a dialogue.



Santosh Rana
General Secretary
30 November 2009

Friday, November 20, 2009

Convention against State Terroism, Siliguri, 6 December 2009

Provisional Central Committee
Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist)
North Bengal Regional Committee

Address for Communication
C/o Vaskar Nandy, Kadamtala, Jalpaiguri

18 October 2009

Dear Friend,

The situation in Lalgarh and the vast hill-forest-plateau extending through Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra of which Lalgarh is a part, both geographically and culturally, is very grave and extremely precarious in terms of the lives and livelihoods of the indigenous population there.

Governments of all parliamentary hues who rule or have ruled in this region are all champions and executants of the Washington-dictated and corporate-driven policy of displacing lakhs of people from their lands and villages and destroying the environment through extractive and polluting industries. This region has also borne the main brunt of the withdrawal of social safety nets, causing starvation and malnutrition deaths a common occurrence.

The misery and suffering of the affected people, mostly of the first nations of India known via imperialist anthropology as tribals, is a human rights story comparable to the internal history of such apartheid states as Boer-ruled South Africa or Israel. But our corporate media, fawning over the corporate growth story, have naturally missed the real story, more or less.

It is a story of extreme misery and starvation that must be told over and over again. But it is also a story of militant resistance that defies Heaven. That story has also been submerged in the endless litany generated by the pincer attack on this resistance by two forces: on the one side, the brutal attack on that resistance by the central and state governments and on the other side, the retaliatory, ultimately counterproductive, and often pointless attack by the Maoists on the state forces and any one among the people who disagree with them.

The Maoist activities have been used by central and state governments as the justification of its suppression of the people’s movements not only in the hill-forest-plateau area but throughout India. Anyone opposed to state terrorism, the main danger today, and anyone sympathetic to the people’s cause are arrested and/or threatened by preventive detention and torture most foul. Countless women have been arrested as armed Maoists for possessing such lethal weapons as brooms, as admitted by the police in a magistrate’s court in West Bengal.

Now it is not just a question of suppressing the masses in the region, but the suppression of all solidarity with those masses. Leading intellectuals, artists and activists are being tarred with the Maoist brush and threatened with preventive detention. It is almost the second coming of the Emergency. But this time the whole political class of official India remains united, so there is no need for a formal declaration.

It is now therefore important that all democrats and all those who want peace with social justice to unite and oppose state terrorism and its Maoist counterpart. It is time to roll back the black laws now in force and it is time to unite in struggle.

We invite you to come together at a convention (not a party meeting) that is being organised in Siliguri, West Bengal on 6 December 2009 at the Bagha Jatin Hall (beside Siliguri College) at 11 a.m. so that all opinions are heard and a broad based movement in a consensual direction can be launched fr4om here in North Bengal and move on towards wider unity throughout the state and country.

Yours sincerely.

Tapan Nag

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Nepal: The People's Movement


by Ben Peterson

In defense of civilian supremacy over the military and the democratic "New Nepal" process, the revolutionary movement of Nepal, led by the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists), has initiated a nationwide "People's Movement" to topple the government and anti-people forces.

This comes after a Maoist-led government resigned in May due to what was essentially an unconstitutional coup by foreign powers, the political opposition, and the military.

The root cause of this conflict is the clash between the established elite and the majority of Nepal's poor.  After the overthrow of the despised King in 2006, a process of re-founding and recreating Nepal was initiated.  However, when it came to challenging the old state and trying to create new, democratic, and pro-people state structures, status-quoist forces sought to derail this process so as to protect their own power and privilege.

This was most evidently shown when the main parties of "responsible civil society" (the elites), the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist Leninist) and the Nepali Congress, chose to back the royalist military over the democratically elected government in May.  After the NC President Ram Baran Yadav unconstitutionally reinstated the head of the military defying the government's orders, the Maoists decided to resign from government rather than stay in a hollow office.

Dipak Sakota, Journalist with Janadisha Daily in Kathmandu, told Green Left Weekly:

Unified CPN (Maoist) has now started the People's Movement.  And this is quite serious.  This is not just a movement but it's a kind of decisive battle to decide who will hold the real power of Nepali state.  . . . [M]ost of the central leaders of the UCPN-M including Chairman Prachanda are in the field leading the movement. . . .   [T]he leadership of King had been removed but had not been filled by other forces. . . .  The Maoists are trying to turn Nepali state in favor of the majority of the poor and oppressed Nepali People.


After spending an extended period reaching out to the community across the nation, the Maoists have now launched a new mass movement to protect the revolutionary process.

Within the Assembly, they have blocked the new budget, until such a time when civilian supremacy has been assured.  The ministries have now already run out of funding and the state is crawling to a stop for lack of resources.

Outside of the Assembly, people are pouring into the streets.  Already there have been blockades and occupations of different local administration offices across the country.  In some areas there are reports of alternative local administrations being established.

The protests will climax with a blockade of Kathmandu and the seat of government, Singha Durbar.

In an attempt to find a peaceful way out of this conflict of interests, the United Nations proposed to Nepal's government that it open itself for a government of national unity.  This suggestion was slammed by the current government, however, claiming that the current government already is a government of national unity, despite it being founded via unconstitutional means and excluding the party that won the elections.

Nepal's elite, faced with the prospects of being forced to back down by the mass movement, has put the police, armed police, and military on high alert.  A meeting of high-level government members on November 3 declared that the Maoists' protest program was in breach of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed in 2006 and that it "bypasses the jurisdiction of the Constituent Assembly."  Information and Communications Minister Shanker Pokarel told reporters: "The government is determined to ensure law and order with the help of the police force."

These threats were denounced by Chairman Prachanda, the leader of the UCPN(Maoist).  He warned the current government against making such threats, as that mimics the actions of the now dethroned King Gyanendra.  He added that, while they have put the armed forces on high alert, the current government could not suppress the movement even if they wanted to, as the government has such small support amongst the people of Nepal.

At any rate, a colossal clash of interests is unfolding in Nepal, and the outcome of this struggle will directly affect the future direction of the new Himalayan republic.

Monthly Review, 12.11.09
 

Ben Peterson is an Australian journalist.


Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Document:: Press Release dt 17.11.2009

COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST-LENINIST)
PROVISIONAL CENTRAL COMMITTEE
L-3 LIG HOUSING ESTATE, 49 N.N.ROAD, KOLKATA-700011


Sri K.L.Tamta,the IG (Police) North Bengal has issued a statement to the media alleging Comrade Vaskar Nandy, a member of Polit Bureau of our party and the mass-organisations led by him as “Maoist” and has threatened to take actions against them.

Com Vaskar Nandy is a senior member of our party and he has been organizing the workers in the tea-gardens and the peasants in the area over the last forty years. The tea-garden labourers are mostly Adivasis and Gorkhas and are among the most exploited in the country. The wage they get is much less than even the minimum wage for agricultural labourers and hunger-death is very common among them. Very often the PF is not deposited. The tea-garden owners and the corrupt officials do not like our activity in the area like organizing the people for NREGA, BPL cards to all poors, ICDS and food-security.

The IG of North Bengal is acting in collusion with the tea-owners and wants to curb our activities. We are apprehending a large scale attack on all democratic movements in the country . This resembles a situation like the Emergency in 1975 and all democratic forces should come forward to resist it.

Santosh Rana
General secretary
PH 0 9332372220
e-mail: rranagopi@in.com

Stepwise Revolutionary Advance in Nepal

by Analytical Monthly Review

Analytical Monthly Review, published in Kharagpur, West Bengal, India, is a sister edition of Monthly Review. Its November 2009 issue features the following editorial. -- Ed.

We last commented on events in Nepal in our May editorial, following the attempt of the ceremonial president to exercise royal authority by "countermanding" the decision of the elected government to dismiss the openly insubordinate army commander, General Katawal. The government, headed by the Unified Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist and its chairman Prachanda, immediately resigned.

A government was then cobbled together dominated by the two primary political parties of the parliamentary regime of the deposed monarchy, the Nepal Congress (party of those who own meaningful property) and the UML (party primarily of the petit bourgeoisie). These parties had been decisively defeated in the April 2008 elections for the Constituent Assembly, obtaining fewer seats when added together than the UCPN(M). The new government chief became Madhav Kumar Nepal, head of the UML, who had run in two constituencies in the Constituent Assembly elections and been defeated by the UCPN(M) candidate in both! This practical demonstration of "democracy" has not been lost on the people of Nepal.

In the intervening half-year, the UCPN(M) has made the world aware that civilian supremacy over the military is the foremost issue in Nepal. Of all the unfinished business of the revolutionary civil war that deposed the monarch, the continuing control of the Nepal Army by U.S. "advised" officers remains the leading obstacle to any lasting peace. Although the agreements that ended the civil war explicitly required the "democratisation" of the Nepal Army, nothing whatever has been done. Since May the UCPN(M) has peacefully obstructed all initiatives of the defeated parties insisting that first the question of civilian control of the military must be decided. In a complete admission of moral impotence, the Madhav Nepal government refuses to permit the question of civilian control even to be debated in the Constituent Assembly.

The plan for Nepal's future as set out by Washington, New Delhi and their friends in the traditional political parties of Nepal is that the revolution is over once and for all, and no further substantive change shall be permitted. The Nepal Army shall stay under their control, as shall the judiciary and the higher civil service. "Development" -- such as it is -- shall be dictated by foreign "aid" and those who provide it. "Freedom of the Press" shall continue to mean that the media belongs to those who have the most money; in Nepal that means the friends and agents of the United States and India. "Equality" shall continue to mean only a set of formal rights set out in law codes, but even that beyond the reach of anyone unable to afford the best and most expensive lawyers. And "democracy" shall be ceremonial voting exercises in which no challenge is permitted to the power of the top layer of society and the agents of the United States and India, and the armed forces they control. In short, the complex of individual "rights" and exploitation that every honest person in the world recognizes as the fraud of bourgeois democracy, the most efficient form of the dictatorship of capital and its personifications.

Even among our friends there have been some who believed that the UCPN(M), having led a successful revolutionary war, had nonetheless settled for this fraud through a mistaken understanding of the "theory of stages" in revolutionary development. But as the last six months have shown, the UCPN(M), beyond dispute now the dominant mass force throughout Nepal, have used events for political education to deepen their presence. The next revolutionary advance -- toward a new democracy in which the majority actually rules -- requires that the class essence of the bourgeois democratic parties (and the version of "democracy" as advocated by their advisers from the United States and India) be understood by the entire leading elements of the working people of Nepal and not only party theoreticians. And this task is now successfully underway.

What is at issue is the achievement of the new democratic revolution in Nepal and the first steps in the transition to socialism. Readers of this journal will know that we see this not as an issue of concern to Nepal alone, but a necessity on the broadest scale if planet-wide catastrophe is to be avoided. As the advance of the people of Nepal quickens in the coming months, the revolutionary forces are owed the practical solidarity of all sincere Marxists the world over and such assistance as we are able to give -- it's in our own interest as well.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Solve the Problems through Dialogue, NOT through Terror

Jharkhand Andolan Samanway Manch 
Press Release, October 7 2009

On October 1, 2009, Sri Panchanan Tudu, President of the Jharkhand Janamukti Morcha was killed. The next day followed the killing of Sri Amalendu Patra, an activist of the same party. According to the press release of Maoist leader Bikash published in the Times of India on October 3, 2009, they (Tudu and Patra) were killed by the Maoists because the slain leader and activist joined the Samanway Munch. Earlier the Maoists had killed some leaders and sympathizers of the Jharkhand Party (Aditya). Other than these, a doctor and a nurse, polling personnel, school-teachers, agricultural labourers and poor peasants, some of whom were CPI(M) supporters, were murdered. Most of them belonged to poor Dalit and Adivasi communities. Since November 2008, when the movement against police atrocities started, the political forces participating in Jharkhand movement have been demanding autonomy for development through empowerment. The form of autonomy demanded would be such that the financial and administrative power would be vested in the hands of autonomous councils to be elected by the people on the basis of universal suffrage and all political parties would enjoy the freedom of carrying out political activities.

The State Government did not take the course of dialogue with the people and the elected panchayts; instead, it resorted to state terror to suppress the mass movement.

On the other hand the Maoists started killing the cadres and sympathizers of other political parties active in the area and tried to impose their one-party rule. Previously, the CPI(M) had tried to curb all opposition parties in the area. The Jharkhand movement had opposed it. Similarly, we are opposed to the one-party rule of the Maoists or any other party.

The Jharkhand Andolan Samanway Manch believes that organs of political power have to be elected by the people on the basis of universal suffrage. This is a fundamental democratic right. The JASM will stick to this fundamental position while launching movement for autonomy. The Maoists in Lalgarh want to have all power vested in the hands of armed squads led by them. They are unwilling to accept elected bodies as organs of political power. So, they want to stop all activities by other political parties. They are attacking the JASM because it opposes the Maoists’ practice of eliminating all oppositions and differences of opinion.

We are opposing the arrest of Chhatradhar Mahato under the UAPA and demanding that the UAPA be scrapped. We are strongly condemning the State Government for threatening the intellectuals who had met Chhatradhar and supported the movement. if somebody is to be arrested for talks or contacts with the Maoists then the CPI(M) leaders of West Medinipore have to be arrested first, for they had supplied firearms to the Maoist leader Kishenji way back in 2000 for suppressing the Trinamool Congress and the BJP.

We would like to convey to the State Government, the CPI(M) and the CPI(Maoist) that there is no military solution to the problems of Jangal Mahal.

We demand:
  1. The State Government stops state repression, the UAPA be scrapped and Chhatradhar Mahato be released.
  2. The Maoists stop killing and repression on the people who politically differ with them.
  3. The State Government initiates a dialogue involving all political and social organizations and elected panchayts.
  4. A formula for self-rule and autonomy be developed through dialogue.
  5. The Panchayts elected in 2008 be allowed to function.

We appeal to ALL to cooperate to create an environment of dialogue.


Signatories: Santosh Rana, Manoranjan Mahato, Aditya Kisku, Pradip Banejee, Leba Chand Tudu.